All methods

Conflict Resolution Workshop

Typical duration:
1h 30m

Learn and practise a structured conflict resolution process to transform disagreements into constructive outcomes.

Purpose

The Conflict Resolution Workshop equips teams with a structured process for navigating disagreements constructively. Participants learn to separate positions from interests, practise de-escalation techniques, and work toward mutually beneficial outcomes.

At a glance

DetailValue
Group size6–18
Duration90 minutes
DifficultyHard
Facilitation styleTeach + roleplay
SettingIn-person or virtual

How to run

  1. Conflict styles assessment (15 min): Introduce the Thomas-Kilmann five conflict styles (Competing, Collaborating, Compromising, Avoiding, Accommodating). Each person identifies their default.
  2. Framework: Positions vs. Interests (10 min): Teach the distinction: positions are what people demand; interests are why they demand it. The route to resolution runs through interests.
  3. De-escalation techniques (10 min): Present key techniques: (a) Acknowledge emotions before content, (b) Use "I" statements, (c) Ask curiosity questions, (d) Name the dynamic.
  4. Scenario roleplay (35 min): In trios, practise resolving a conflict scenario. Round 1: use default styles (7 min), debrief (5 min). Round 2: apply the interest-based approach (7 min), debrief (5 min). Rotate roles.
  5. Team application (10 min): Identify one real or recurring team conflict. As a group, map positions to interests and brainstorm interest-based solutions.
  6. Close (10 min): Each person shares one de-escalation technique they will practise this week.

Materials needed

  • Thomas-Kilmann conflict styles overview (poster or handout)
  • Conflict scenario cards (3–4 varied situations)
  • Positions vs. Interests worksheet
  • Timer
  • Flipchart

Pitfalls & common mistakes

  • Staying theoretical: Without roleplay, participants do not internalise the skills. Make practice central.
  • Avoiding real conflicts: Fictional scenarios are a safe start, but the real value is applying to actual team dynamics.
  • Labelling conflict as bad: Frame conflict as natural and potentially productive when handled well.
  • Facilitator taking sides: Stay strictly neutral, especially during team application discussions.

Inclusion & accessibility

  • Let participants self-assess conflict styles privately before sharing.
  • Offer observation roles for those uncomfortable with roleplay.
  • Use diverse scenario cards reflecting different cultural and workplace contexts.
  • Establish ground rules: no personal attacks, focus on behaviour not character.

Variations

  • Mediation skills focus: Extend to 2 hours and include a mediation practice segment.
  • Leadership edition: Focus on resolving conflicts between direct reports.
  • Post-conflict debrief: Use after a real team conflict has been resolved to extract lessons learned.

When NOT to use this

  • When a specific, active conflict between two people needs mediation — address that privately first.
  • When there is a significant power imbalance that makes open discussion unsafe.
  • When the organisation has no genuine interest in resolving conflicts (they just want compliance).

Source & further reading

  • Roger Fisher & William Ury, *Getting to Yes* (Penguin, 2011)
  • Kenneth Thomas & Ralph Kilmann, Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument
  • Dana Caspersen, *Changing the Conversation* (Penguin, 2015)

Turn the building blocks into an agenda

Create the day, drag the blocks into the order you have in mind, and let the times work themselves out. Or describe what you are planning to your AI and let it write the first draft.

Try it free for 14 days
Conflict Resolution Workshop · GoodWorkshop